O ECOSSISTEMA SERGIPANO DE INOVAÇÃO – ATORES E LACUNAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25112/rpr.v1.2594Palabras clave:
Empreendedorismo, Habitats de Inovação, Conexão, Inovação, SergipeResumen
La innovación es un tema que ha recibido mucha atención por parte de la academia en los últimos años, debido intrínsecamente al incremento en el número de proyectos en los tres sectores de la economía, que forman parte de la agenda propuesta de Continentes, Países, Regiones, Estados, Microrregiones, Regiones Geográficas Inmediatas, Municipios y Distritos Brasileños. Si bien esta discusión también atraviesa los más diversos actores que trabajan de forma aislada o conjunta en determinados espacios públicos, privados y del tercer sector. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo analizar el ecosistema de innovación del estado de Sergipe a partir de la comparación de la literatura científica y los resultados de la investigación empírica. El trabajo cualitativo se configuró como un estudio de caso, con muestreo no probabilístico, por cuotas. Como fuentes de evidencia se utilizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas, observación no participante, análisis de documentos, registro en archivos y artefactos físicos. Para la base teórica se realizó una revisión sistemática del concepto, actores y casos del ecosistema de innovación a partir del análisis de publicaciones en la base de datos Web of Science. Como técnica de investigación, se utilizó el análisis de contenido con la ayuda del software con licencia Nvivo 12 en el análisis de todo el contenido investigado. Como consideraciones finales, se señala que no existe ningún proyecto de iniciativa pública dirigido al desarrollo de la innovación en el estado de Sergipe. Algunas acciones del Valle del Caju, SEBRAE, Movimento Inova Mais Sergipe, Fapitec-SE y SergipeTec mueven el ecosistema de innovación, pero se observa que el estado tiene una estructura incipiente en cuanto a su ecosistema de innovación ubicado básicamente en las ciudades de Aracaju y São Cristóvão, con sin conexión con el interior del estado. UFS, UNIT e IFS, instituciones de educación superior en el estado, en los últimos años han estado tratando de implementar algunas acciones para incentivar el emprendimiento y la innovación, pero en general el ecosistema está en su etapa de nacimiento.
Citas
ADNER, R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, v. 84, n. 4, p. 98-107, 2006.
ADNER, R.; KAPOOR, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, n. 3, p. 306–333, 2010.
ALLAHAR, H.; BRATHWAITE, C. Business incubation as an instrument of innovation: the experience of South America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Innovation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 71-85, Jul-Dec 2016.
ANDERSEN, J. What are innovation ecosystems and how to build and use them. 2011. Disponível em: https://innovationmanagement.se/2011/05/16/what-are-innovation-ecosystems-and-how-to-build-and-use-them/. Acesso em: 02 jan. 2017.
AUDRETSCH, D. et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 2, p. 313-325, 2019.
AUTIO, E.; NAMBISAN, S.; THOMAS, L.; WRIGHT, M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), p. 72–95, 2018.
BACCARNE, B. et al. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 22-30, 2016.
BAHRAMI, H.; EVANS, S. Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship. California Management Review, v. 37, p. 62-89, 1995.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. 6. ed. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
BROWN, R. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 189-205, 2016.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 46, n. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), v. 1, n. 1, p. 41-69, 2010.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of Knowledge Economics, v. 2, p. 327–372, 2011.
CARAYANNIS, E.; BARTH, T.; CAMPBELL, D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 1-2, 2012.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; RAKHMATULLIN, R. The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialization Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economics, v. 5, p. 212–239, 2014.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D.; REHMAN, S. Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, p 5 -17, 2016.
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. USA: HBS Press Book, 2003. p. 272.
CHOI, B; PHAN, K. Platform leadership in business ecosystem: Literature-based study on Resource Dependence Theory (RDT). Proceedings of the 2012 PICMET Conference, 133-138, 2012.
CLAUDEL, M. From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 8, n. 6, p. 34-47, 2018.
COLOMBO, M., DAGNINO, G., LEHMANN, E., SALMADOR, M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, v. 52, p. 419-428, 2017.
COHEN, B. Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 15 (1), p. 1–14, 2006.
CHRISTENSEN, M.; RAYNOR, M.; MCDONALD, R. What is Disruptive Innovation? 2015. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J. A.; MENTER, M.; YOUNG, C. A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 42(4), p. 923–956, 2017.
CUKIER, D.; KON, F.; LYONS, T. S. Software Startup Ecosystems Evolution: The New York City Case Study. 2nd International Workshop on Software Startups, 2016.
DEDEHAYIR, O.; MÄKINEN, S. J.; ORTT, J. R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 18-29, 2018.
DE SILVA, M.; HOWELLS, J.; MEYER, M. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 1, p. 70-87, 2018.
DI DIO, F.; CORREANI, L. Quality-improving and cost-reducing strategic alliances. Economia Política, v. 37, n. 2, p. 493-524, 2020.
DUBINI, P. The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of business venturing, Elsevier, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11–26, 1989.
DURST, S.; POUTANEN, P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems – Initial insights from a literature review. Aalto University Publication, p. 27-38, 2013.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: Academic-industry-government relations - Implications for the New York regional innovation environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 787, p. 67-86, 1996.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of University- Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information, Paris, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293-337. 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon. An introduction to the Special Issue. Silicon Valley: Global model or unique anomaly/Numéro special, La Silicon Valley: Modèle global ou anomalie singulière. Social Science Information, 52 (4), p. 515-538, 2013.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, p. 14-19, 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies (Conference Report). Science & Public Policy, vol. 25(3), p. 195-203, 1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, p. 109-123, 2000.
FAN, P.; WAN, G.; LU, M. China’s Regional Inequality in Innovation Capability. China & World Economy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 16-36, 2012.
FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. Wiley, p. 212, 2012.
FERDINAND, J. P.; MEYER, U. The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community-firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, v. 9, p. 16, 2017.
FERRETTI, M.; PARMENTOLA, A. Technological learning and innovation systems in developing countries: the example of Dubai. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, vol. 3, n. 1, p. 37-59, 2015.
GAWER, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1239-1249, 2014.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1347-1366, 2019.
GOBBLE, M. Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, v. 57 (4), p. 55-59, 2014.
HAKALA, H. et al. Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 22, n. 1, p. 10-32, 2020.
HWANG, V. W.; HOROWITT, G. The Rainforest - the secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills: Regenwald, 2012.
IANSISTI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2004.
IANSITI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 68-81, 2004a.
IANSITI, M., LEVIEN, R. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2004b.
ISENBERG, D. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs, 2011.
JACOBIDES, M.; CENNAMO, C.; GAWER, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, v. 39, n. 8, p. 2255-2276, 2018.
JISHNU, V.; GILHOTRA, R. M.; MISHRA, D. N. Pharmacy education in India: Strategies for a better future. Journal of Young Pharmacists, v. 3, n. 4, p. 334-342, 2011.
JUCEVICIUS, G. et al. The Emerging Innovation Ecosystems and “Valley of Death”: Towards the Combination of Entrepreneurial and Institutional Approaches. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, v. 27, n. 4, p. 430-438, 2016.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano-Electronics. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64, 2013.
LESTER, R.; PIORE, M. Innovation - The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Harvard University Press, 2006.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, v. 25, p.195-203, 1998.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, v. 29(2), p. 109-123, 2000.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, v. 58, (2), 2003.
LI, Y. The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation, v. 29, p. 379-386, 2009.
KOENIG, G. Business Ecosystems Revisited. Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 208-224, 2012.
KORTELAINEN, S.; JÄRVI, K. Ecosystems: systematic literature review and framework development. In: ISPIM Conference – Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society, 25. Dublin, Ireland, jun, 2014.
MA, L. et al. The Impact of Local Government Policy on Innovation Ecosystem in Knowledge Resource Scarce Region: Case Study of Changzhou, China. Science Technology and Society, v. 24, n. 1, p. 29-52, 2019.
MARKKULA, M.; KUNE, H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 7-15, 2015.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. High Growth Firms in Scotland. Scottish Enterprise, Glasgow, 2010.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, v. 40, n. 2, p. 211-225, 2013.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 2014.
MAYA-CARRILLO, A. M. et al. Opportunity entrepreneurship in the context of the change of the productive matrix: an innovative strategy - Ecuador. Vision Gerencial, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305-328, 2016.
MCADAM, M.; MILLER, K.; MCADAM, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, v. 50-51, p. 69-78, 2016.
MILLER, K. et al. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R & D Management, v. 46, n. 2, p. 383-399, 2016.
MOORE, J. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, n. 2, May-June, p. 75-86, 1993.
MOORE, J. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business, 1996.
MOORE, J. Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin, Spring 51, 1; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 31- 75, 2006.
NAMAAYANDE, P.; KHAMSEH, A. Innovation ecosystem for SMES in ICT industry. Journal of Management and Technology, v. 19, p. 141-159, 2019.
NAMBA, M. Accelerating Commercialization of University Output by Translating It into Social Value. Technology Management for the Global Future, PICMET, 794-802, 2006.
NAPIER, G.; HANSEN, C. Ecosystems for Young Scalable Firms. Copenhagen: FORA Group, 2011.
NELSON, R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 193–214, 1990.
NELSON, R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. p. 543.
OECD/Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, 2018.
O’CONNOR, G.; RICE, M. A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (1), 2-18, 2013.
OH, D. S.; PHILLIPS, F.; PARK, S.; LEE, E. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, p. 1–6, 2016.
PELTONIEMI, M. Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Émerg.: Complex. Organ. v. 8, n. 1, p. 10–19, 2006.
PIQUE, J. M.; BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple Helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 21, 2018.
RADICIC, D.; PUGH, G.; DOUGLAS, D. Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, v. 54, n. 1, p. 257-283, 2020.
RAJAHONKA, M. et al. Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOCUS Project and Change 2020 Programmed. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 52-62, 2015.
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, IP Publishing Ltd, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237–262, 2013.
RAMPERSAD, G. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, v. 7 (3), p. 1122–1134, 2016.
REYNOLDS, E.; UYGUN, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 178–191, 2018.
RITALA, P., ALMPANOPOULOU, A. In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, v. 60, p. 39- 42, 2017.
ROUNDY, P. T.; BRADSHAW, M.; BROCKMAN, B. K. The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1-10, 2018.
SÁBATO, J.; BOTANA, N. La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración, Buenos Aires, n. 3, p. 15-36, nov. 1968.
SAUTTER, B. Futuring European industry: assessing the Manufacture road towards EU re-industrialization. European Journal of Futures Research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 12, 2016.
SCHAEFFER, P. R.; FISCHER, B.; QUEIROZ, S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and Sti Governance, v. 12, n. 2, p. 50-61, 2018.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, 1939. p. 385.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942. p. 381.
SPIGEL, B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (1), 49-72, 2017.
SPINOSA, L. M.; SCHLEMM, M. M.; REIS, R. S. Brazilian innovation ecosystems in perspective: some challenges for stakeholders. REBRAE, Curitiba, v. 8, n. 3, p. 386-400, 2015.
TAMTIK, M. Innovation policy is a team sport - insight from non-governmental intermediaries in Canadian innovation ecosystem. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19, 2018.
TUMELERO, C. et al. The role of networks in technological capability: a technology-based companies perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, v. 8 (1), p. 19, 2018.
UBREZIOVA, I. et al. Innovation ecosystems for the moldovan small and medium-sized enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, v. 10 (2), p. 298-312, 2020.
VALKOKARI, K. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 5 (8), 17-24, 2015.
TRISCHLER, J.; JOHNSON, M.; KRISTENSSON, P. A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, v. 116 (4), p. 552-560, 2020.
XU, G. N. et al. Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 208-221, 2018.
YILMAZ, L. Toward Multi-Level, Multi-Theoretical Model Portfolios for Scientific Enterprise Workforce Dynamics. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 6, 2011.
YIN, R. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014. p. 282.
YIN, R. Case Study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017. p. 352.
YOGUEL, G.; BORELLO, J.; ERBES, A. Argentina: how to study and act upon local innovation systems. Cepal Review, n. 99, p. 63-80, dez. 2009.
ZELENY, M.; CORNET, R.; STONER, J. Management Challenges in the 1990. In: HENNESSY, J. E.; ROBINS, S. Managing Toward the Millennium. New York: Fordham, University Press, v. 10 (2), p. 3-65, 1991.
ZHANG, W.; LIU, P. F.; ZHANG, J. K. Multi-Group Symbiotic Evolution Mechanism in an Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from China. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, v. 66, p. 249-277, 2019.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Matheus Pereira Mattos Felizola, Iracema Machado de Aragão
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
• Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
• Os autores são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), pois isso pode aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
