O ECOSSISTEMA SERGIPANO DE INOVAÇÃO – ATORES E LACUNAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25112/rpr.v1.2594Keywords:
Empreendedorismo, Habitats de Inovação, Conexão, Inovação, SergipeAbstract
Innovation is a topic that has received a lot of attention from academy in recent years, due intrinsically to the increase in the number of projects in the three sectors of the economy, forming part of the proposed agenda of Continents, Countries, Regions, States, Microregions, Immediate Geographic Regions, Municipalities and Brazilian Districts. While this discussion also runs through the most diverse actors that work in an isolated or joint way in certain public, private and third sector spaces. This research aimed to analyze the innovation ecosystem of the state of Sergipe from the comparison of scientific literature and the results of empirical research. The qualitative work was configured as a case study, with non-probabilistic sampling, by quotas. As sources of evidence, semi-structured interviews, non-participant observation, analysis of documents, registration in files and physical artifacts were used. For the theoretical basis, a systematic review of the concept, actors and cases of the innovation ecosystem was carried out based on the analysis of publications in the Web of Science database. As a research technique, content analysis was used with the aid of Nvivo 12 licensed software in the analysis of all investigated content. As final considerations, it is noted that there is no project by the public initiative aimed at the development of innovation in the state of Sergipe. Some actions by Caju Valley, SEBRAE, Movimento Inova Mais Sergipe, Fapitec-SE and SergipeTec move the innovation ecosystem, but it is observed that the state has an incipient structure in relation to its innovation ecosystem located basically in the cities of Aracaju and São Cristóvão, with no connection to the interior of the state. UFS, UNIT and IFS, institutions of higher education in the state, in recent years have been trying to implement some actions to encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, but in general the ecosystem is in its birth stage.
References
ADNER, R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, v. 84, n. 4, p. 98-107, 2006.
ADNER, R.; KAPOOR, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, n. 3, p. 306–333, 2010.
ALLAHAR, H.; BRATHWAITE, C. Business incubation as an instrument of innovation: the experience of South America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Innovation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 71-85, Jul-Dec 2016.
ANDERSEN, J. What are innovation ecosystems and how to build and use them. 2011. Disponível em: https://innovationmanagement.se/2011/05/16/what-are-innovation-ecosystems-and-how-to-build-and-use-them/. Acesso em: 02 jan. 2017.
AUDRETSCH, D. et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 2, p. 313-325, 2019.
AUTIO, E.; NAMBISAN, S.; THOMAS, L.; WRIGHT, M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), p. 72–95, 2018.
BACCARNE, B. et al. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 22-30, 2016.
BAHRAMI, H.; EVANS, S. Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship. California Management Review, v. 37, p. 62-89, 1995.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. 6. ed. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
BROWN, R. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 189-205, 2016.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 46, n. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), v. 1, n. 1, p. 41-69, 2010.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of Knowledge Economics, v. 2, p. 327–372, 2011.
CARAYANNIS, E.; BARTH, T.; CAMPBELL, D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 1-2, 2012.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; RAKHMATULLIN, R. The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialization Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economics, v. 5, p. 212–239, 2014.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D.; REHMAN, S. Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, p 5 -17, 2016.
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. USA: HBS Press Book, 2003. p. 272.
CHOI, B; PHAN, K. Platform leadership in business ecosystem: Literature-based study on Resource Dependence Theory (RDT). Proceedings of the 2012 PICMET Conference, 133-138, 2012.
CLAUDEL, M. From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 8, n. 6, p. 34-47, 2018.
COLOMBO, M., DAGNINO, G., LEHMANN, E., SALMADOR, M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, v. 52, p. 419-428, 2017.
COHEN, B. Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 15 (1), p. 1–14, 2006.
CHRISTENSEN, M.; RAYNOR, M.; MCDONALD, R. What is Disruptive Innovation? 2015. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J. A.; MENTER, M.; YOUNG, C. A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 42(4), p. 923–956, 2017.
CUKIER, D.; KON, F.; LYONS, T. S. Software Startup Ecosystems Evolution: The New York City Case Study. 2nd International Workshop on Software Startups, 2016.
DEDEHAYIR, O.; MÄKINEN, S. J.; ORTT, J. R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 18-29, 2018.
DE SILVA, M.; HOWELLS, J.; MEYER, M. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 1, p. 70-87, 2018.
DI DIO, F.; CORREANI, L. Quality-improving and cost-reducing strategic alliances. Economia Política, v. 37, n. 2, p. 493-524, 2020.
DUBINI, P. The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of business venturing, Elsevier, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11–26, 1989.
DURST, S.; POUTANEN, P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems – Initial insights from a literature review. Aalto University Publication, p. 27-38, 2013.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: Academic-industry-government relations - Implications for the New York regional innovation environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 787, p. 67-86, 1996.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of University- Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information, Paris, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293-337. 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon. An introduction to the Special Issue. Silicon Valley: Global model or unique anomaly/Numéro special, La Silicon Valley: Modèle global ou anomalie singulière. Social Science Information, 52 (4), p. 515-538, 2013.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, p. 14-19, 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies (Conference Report). Science & Public Policy, vol. 25(3), p. 195-203, 1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, p. 109-123, 2000.
FAN, P.; WAN, G.; LU, M. China’s Regional Inequality in Innovation Capability. China & World Economy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 16-36, 2012.
FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. Wiley, p. 212, 2012.
FERDINAND, J. P.; MEYER, U. The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community-firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, v. 9, p. 16, 2017.
FERRETTI, M.; PARMENTOLA, A. Technological learning and innovation systems in developing countries: the example of Dubai. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, vol. 3, n. 1, p. 37-59, 2015.
GAWER, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1239-1249, 2014.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1347-1366, 2019.
GOBBLE, M. Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, v. 57 (4), p. 55-59, 2014.
HAKALA, H. et al. Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 22, n. 1, p. 10-32, 2020.
HWANG, V. W.; HOROWITT, G. The Rainforest - the secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills: Regenwald, 2012.
IANSISTI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2004.
IANSITI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 68-81, 2004a.
IANSITI, M., LEVIEN, R. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2004b.
ISENBERG, D. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs, 2011.
JACOBIDES, M.; CENNAMO, C.; GAWER, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, v. 39, n. 8, p. 2255-2276, 2018.
JISHNU, V.; GILHOTRA, R. M.; MISHRA, D. N. Pharmacy education in India: Strategies for a better future. Journal of Young Pharmacists, v. 3, n. 4, p. 334-342, 2011.
JUCEVICIUS, G. et al. The Emerging Innovation Ecosystems and “Valley of Death”: Towards the Combination of Entrepreneurial and Institutional Approaches. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, v. 27, n. 4, p. 430-438, 2016.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano-Electronics. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64, 2013.
LESTER, R.; PIORE, M. Innovation - The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Harvard University Press, 2006.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, v. 25, p.195-203, 1998.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, v. 29(2), p. 109-123, 2000.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, v. 58, (2), 2003.
LI, Y. The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation, v. 29, p. 379-386, 2009.
KOENIG, G. Business Ecosystems Revisited. Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 208-224, 2012.
KORTELAINEN, S.; JÄRVI, K. Ecosystems: systematic literature review and framework development. In: ISPIM Conference – Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society, 25. Dublin, Ireland, jun, 2014.
MA, L. et al. The Impact of Local Government Policy on Innovation Ecosystem in Knowledge Resource Scarce Region: Case Study of Changzhou, China. Science Technology and Society, v. 24, n. 1, p. 29-52, 2019.
MARKKULA, M.; KUNE, H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 7-15, 2015.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. High Growth Firms in Scotland. Scottish Enterprise, Glasgow, 2010.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, v. 40, n. 2, p. 211-225, 2013.
MASON, C.; BROWN, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 2014.
MAYA-CARRILLO, A. M. et al. Opportunity entrepreneurship in the context of the change of the productive matrix: an innovative strategy - Ecuador. Vision Gerencial, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305-328, 2016.
MCADAM, M.; MILLER, K.; MCADAM, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, v. 50-51, p. 69-78, 2016.
MILLER, K. et al. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R & D Management, v. 46, n. 2, p. 383-399, 2016.
MOORE, J. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, n. 2, May-June, p. 75-86, 1993.
MOORE, J. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business, 1996.
MOORE, J. Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. Antitrust Bulletin, Spring 51, 1; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 31- 75, 2006.
NAMAAYANDE, P.; KHAMSEH, A. Innovation ecosystem for SMES in ICT industry. Journal of Management and Technology, v. 19, p. 141-159, 2019.
NAMBA, M. Accelerating Commercialization of University Output by Translating It into Social Value. Technology Management for the Global Future, PICMET, 794-802, 2006.
NAPIER, G.; HANSEN, C. Ecosystems for Young Scalable Firms. Copenhagen: FORA Group, 2011.
NELSON, R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 193–214, 1990.
NELSON, R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. p. 543.
OECD/Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, 2018.
O’CONNOR, G.; RICE, M. A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (1), 2-18, 2013.
OH, D. S.; PHILLIPS, F.; PARK, S.; LEE, E. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, p. 1–6, 2016.
PELTONIEMI, M. Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Émerg.: Complex. Organ. v. 8, n. 1, p. 10–19, 2006.
PIQUE, J. M.; BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple Helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 21, 2018.
RADICIC, D.; PUGH, G.; DOUGLAS, D. Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, v. 54, n. 1, p. 257-283, 2020.
RAJAHONKA, M. et al. Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOCUS Project and Change 2020 Programmed. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 52-62, 2015.
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, IP Publishing Ltd, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237–262, 2013.
RAMPERSAD, G. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, v. 7 (3), p. 1122–1134, 2016.
REYNOLDS, E.; UYGUN, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 178–191, 2018.
RITALA, P., ALMPANOPOULOU, A. In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, v. 60, p. 39- 42, 2017.
ROUNDY, P. T.; BRADSHAW, M.; BROCKMAN, B. K. The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1-10, 2018.
SÁBATO, J.; BOTANA, N. La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración, Buenos Aires, n. 3, p. 15-36, nov. 1968.
SAUTTER, B. Futuring European industry: assessing the Manufacture road towards EU re-industrialization. European Journal of Futures Research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 12, 2016.
SCHAEFFER, P. R.; FISCHER, B.; QUEIROZ, S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and Sti Governance, v. 12, n. 2, p. 50-61, 2018.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, 1939. p. 385.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942. p. 381.
SPIGEL, B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (1), 49-72, 2017.
SPINOSA, L. M.; SCHLEMM, M. M.; REIS, R. S. Brazilian innovation ecosystems in perspective: some challenges for stakeholders. REBRAE, Curitiba, v. 8, n. 3, p. 386-400, 2015.
TAMTIK, M. Innovation policy is a team sport - insight from non-governmental intermediaries in Canadian innovation ecosystem. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19, 2018.
TUMELERO, C. et al. The role of networks in technological capability: a technology-based companies perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, v. 8 (1), p. 19, 2018.
UBREZIOVA, I. et al. Innovation ecosystems for the moldovan small and medium-sized enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, v. 10 (2), p. 298-312, 2020.
VALKOKARI, K. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 5 (8), 17-24, 2015.
TRISCHLER, J.; JOHNSON, M.; KRISTENSSON, P. A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, v. 116 (4), p. 552-560, 2020.
XU, G. N. et al. Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 208-221, 2018.
YILMAZ, L. Toward Multi-Level, Multi-Theoretical Model Portfolios for Scientific Enterprise Workforce Dynamics. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 6, 2011.
YIN, R. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014. p. 282.
YIN, R. Case Study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017. p. 352.
YOGUEL, G.; BORELLO, J.; ERBES, A. Argentina: how to study and act upon local innovation systems. Cepal Review, n. 99, p. 63-80, dez. 2009.
ZELENY, M.; CORNET, R.; STONER, J. Management Challenges in the 1990. In: HENNESSY, J. E.; ROBINS, S. Managing Toward the Millennium. New York: Fordham, University Press, v. 10 (2), p. 3-65, 1991.
ZHANG, W.; LIU, P. F.; ZHANG, J. K. Multi-Group Symbiotic Evolution Mechanism in an Innovative Ecosystem: Evidence from China. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, v. 66, p. 249-277, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Matheus Pereira Mattos Felizola, Iracema Machado de Aragão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
• Os autores são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), pois isso pode aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
