SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: THE DEVELOPMENT CYCLE OF BIOINPUTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25112/rgd.v21i2.3887

Keywords:

Bioinputs, Technological Maturity, Open innovation, Product Development Cycle

Abstract

Technology transfer, facilitated by open innovation, strengthens collaboration between universities and industries, driving economic growth. To assess the technological maturity of bioinputs, this partnership becomes essential, enabling the development and enhancement of products that drive significant advancements in agriculture and sustainability. This research presents a review that explored methods for measuring the technological maturity of bioinputs, along with relevant criteria and the product development cycle. Studies were selected from databases such as Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science, without date restrictions, focusing on research related to bioinput development and its technological maturity. Seventeen publications were included in this review (n=64). From these selected results, we identified the bioinput development cycle, which begins with literature research, followed by laboratory and field tests. Industrial production and acceptance by farmers complete the process. Field trials are crucial as they provide realistic conditions. The farmer plays a decisive role in determining the product’s suitability for their needs. These findings serve as the foundation for establishing the bioinput development cycle and creating a methodology to measure its technological maturity. This concept can guide future research, promote innovation, and enhance the technological maturity of bioinputs, ultimately increasing their acceptance among farmers and advancing the sector.

Author Biographies

Lauren Peres Lorenzoni, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Master in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) (Santa Maria/Brazil). Accountant and Coordinator of Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property at the Dean of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at UFSM.

Tiago Bandeira Marchesan, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

PhD in Electrical Engineering from UFSM. Director of the UFSM Technology Center. Associate Professor III at UFSM. Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering and the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering.

Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

PhD in Production Engineering from UFSC. Associate Professor at UFSM. Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering at UFSM.

Graciele Rediske, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

PhD in Production Engineering from UFSM.

Mayara Rohenkohl Ricci, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Mestre em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria(UFSM) (Santa Maria/Brasil). Doutorando em engenharia de produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). E-mail: mayara.ricci@gmail.com

References

ADELEKE, B. S. et al. Strategies to Enhance the Use of Endophytes as Bioinoculants in Agriculture. Horticulturae, v. 8, n. 6, p. 498, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8060498

ADRODEGARI, F.; SACCANI, N. A maturity model for the servitization of product-centric companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31, n. 4, p. 775-797, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2019-0255

AFONSO, R. A. et al. Brazilian smart cities: using a maturity model to measure and compare inequality in cities. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on digital government research. 2015. p. 230-238. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757426

AGARAS, B. C. et al. Biocontrol potential index of pseudomonads, instead of their direct-growth promotion traits, is a predictor of seed inoculation effect on crop productivity under field conditions. Biological Control, v. 143, p. 104209, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104209

AGROLINK. Mercado de biológicos está se consolidando no Brasil. 22 mai. 2023. Disponível em: <https://www.agrolink.com.br/noticias/mercado-de-biologicos-esta-se-consolidando-no-brasil_479575.html>. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2023.

ALEXANDER, G. L.; POWELL, K.; DEROCHE, C. B.; POPEJOY, L. et al. Building consensus toward a national nursing home information technology maturity model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26, n. 6, p. 495-505, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz006

ALKHAZALEH, Razan; MYKONIATIS, Konstantinos; ALAHMER, Ali. The success of technology transfer in the industry 4.0 era: A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, v. 8, n. 4, p. 202, 2022.

AL-MATARI, O. M. M. et al. Adopting security maturity model to the organizations capability model. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22, n. 2, p. 193-199, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2020.08.001

AL-MATOUQ, H. et al. A Maturity Model for Secure Software Design: A Multivocal Study. IEEE Access, 8, p. 215758-215776, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040220

ALVAREZ‐IGLESIAS, L. et al. Faba bean as green manure for field weed control in maize. Weed Research, v. 58, n. 6, p. 437-449, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12335

ATIENO, M. et al. Assessment of biofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture in the Great Mekong Region. Journal of environmental management, v. 275, p. 111300, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111300

BARROS LUNA, T.; SEVERO, E. A.; MEDEIROS, A. M.; MARINHO, L. P. A. Inovação, liderança e práticas ambientais na performance organizacional do setor bancário: Uma Survey no nordeste brasileiro. Revista Gestão e Desenvolvimento, v. 20, n. 1, p. 28–53, 2023. DOI: 10.25112/rgd.v20i1.2965

BEIMS, R. F.; SIMONATO, C. L.; WIGGERS, V. R. Technology readiness level assessment of pyrolysis of trygliceride biomass to fuels and chemicals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, p. 521-529, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.017

BEJARANO, J. B. P. et al. Open Innovation: A Technology Transfer Alternative from Universities. A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, p. 100090, 2023.

BERNAL, W. N.; ESPITALETA, K. L. G. Framework for Developing an Information Technology Maturity Model for Smart City Services in Emerging Economies:(FSCE2). Applied Sciences, v. 11, n. 22, p. 10712, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210712

CHAVES, A. O., & DA CRUZ, G. P. (2023). Avaliação das produções tecnológicas e de inovação em institutos federais de educação do Brasil. Revista Gestão e Desenvolvimento, v. 20, n. 1, p. 176–197, 2023. DOI: 10.25112/rgd.v20i1.3115

FASI, M. A. An Overview on patenting trends and technology commercialization practices in the university Technology Transfer Offices in USA and China. World Patent Information, v. 68, p. 102097, 2022.

GARCIA, M. V. C.; NOGUEIRA, M. A.; HUNGRIA, M. Combining microorganisms in inoculants is agronomically important but industrially challenging: case study of a composite inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum for the soybean crop. AMB Express, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2021.

GARCÍA, S. S. et al. Paraburkholderia tropica as a plant-growth–promoting bacterium in barley: characterization of tissues colonization by culture-dependent and-independent techniques for use as an agronomic bioinput. Plant and Soil, v. 451, n. 1, p. 89-106, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04174-y

GULBRANSON, C. A.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Proof of concept centers: accelerating the commercialization of university innovation. The Journal of technology transfer, v. 33, p. 249-258, 2008.

HELAL, D. S.; EL-KHAWAS, H. M.; ELSAYED, T. R. Bioactive secondary metabolites extracted from the plant growth promoting bacteria Paraburkholderia tropica. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1-2, 2022. DOI: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2021.105421.4858

HERRMANN, L.; LESUEUR, D. Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, v. 97, n. 20, p. 8859-8873, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8

JÆGER, B.; HALSE, L. L. The IoT Technological Maturity Assessment Scorecard: A Case Study of Norwegian Manufacturing Companies. In: Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing, 2017. cap. Chapter 17, p. 143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_17

KAYSER, A. C., & SCHREIBER, D. Inovação nas empresas a partir de projetos colaborativos. Revista Gestão E Desenvolvimento, v. 10, n. 2, 2013. DOI: 10.25112/rgd.v10i2.1041

KNAGGS, Michael et al. Application of systems readiness level methods in advanced fossil energy applications. Procedia Computer Science, v. 44, p. 497-506, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.071

KYRIAKIDOU, V.; MICHALAKELIS, C.; SPHICOPOULOS, T. Assessment of information and communications technology maturity level. Telecommunications Policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 48-62, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.08.001

LEZAMA-NICOLAS, R. et al. A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: the case of additive manufacturing. SCIENTOMETRICS, 117, n. 3, p. 1425-1452, DEC 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2941-1

LINNENLUECKE, M. K.; MARRONE, M.; SINGH, A. K. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, v. 45, n. 2, p. 175-194, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

MAGNAYE, R. B.; SAUSER, B. J.; RAMIREZ‐MARQUEZ, J. E. System development planning using readiness levels in a cost of development minimization model. Systems Engineering, v. 13, n. 4, p. 311-323, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20151

MALDANER, J. et al. Bioherbicide and anesthetic potential of Aniba canelilla essential oil, a contribution to the demands of the agricultural sector. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, v. 42, p. 102353, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102353

MUNDIM, G. S. M.; MACIEL, G. M.; MENDES, G. O. Aspergillus niger as a Biological Input for Improving Vegetable Seedling Production. Microorganisms, v. 10, n. 4, p. 674, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040674

NEVES, M. F.; CAMBAÚVA, V.; CASAGRANDE, B. P. Os grandes números do mercado de bioinsumos em 2021. Agrivalle. Disponível em: <https://www.agrivalle.com.br/marcos-fava/numeros-do-mercado-de-bioinsumos/>. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2023.

PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

PANPATTE, D. G. et al. Fortified bacterial consortium–A novel approach to control root knot nematode in cucumber (cucumis sativum). Biological Control, v. 155, p. 104528, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104528

PIROLA, F.; CIMINI, C.; PINTO, R. Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: case-study research. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1045-1083, 2020.

PUHAR, Jan et al. Technology Readiness Level Assessment of Formalin Production Pathways. Chemical Engineering Transactions, v. 88, p. 607-612, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2188101

RAFAEL, L. D. et al. An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies. Technological forecasting and social change, v. 159, p. 120203, 2020.

RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ, Jose Emmanuel; SAUSER, Brian J. System development planning via system maturity optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 56, n. 3, p. 533-548, 2009. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2009.2013830.

REDDYPRIYA, P.; SOUMARE, A.; BALACHANDAR, D. Multiplex and quantitative PCR targeting SCAR markers for strain‐level detection and quantification of biofertilizers. Journal of basic microbiology, v. 59, n. 1, p. 111-119, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800318

ROBINSON, K. A.; SALDANHA, I. J.; MCKOY, N. A. Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of clinical epidemiology, v. 64, n. 12, p. 1325-1330, 2011.

SÁNCHEZ, Ó. J.; OSPINA, D. A.; MONTOYA, S. Compost supplementation with nutrients and microorganisms in composting process. Waste management, v. 69, p. 136-153, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.012

SAUSER, Brian J. et al. A system maturity index for the systems engineering life cycle. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, v. 3, n. 6, p. 673, 2008.

SERGEY, A. B.; ALEXANDR, D. B.; SERGEY, A. Terehov. Proof of concept center—a promising tool for innovative development at entrepreneurial universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 166, p. 240-245, 2015.

SIEDLER, C. et al. Maturity model for determining digitalization levels within different product lifecycle phases. Production Engineering, v. 15, n. 3, p. 431-450, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-021-01044-4

SINGH, A.; GILL, S. S. Measuring the maturity of Indian small and medium enterprises for unofficial readiness for capability maturity model integration‐based software process improvement. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, v. 32, n. 9, p. e2261, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2261

SINGH, A.; GILL, S. S. Measuring the maturity of Indian small and medium enterprises for unofficial readiness for capability maturity model integration‐based software process improvement. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, v. 32, n. 9, p. e2261, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2261

SUMMITAGRO. Mercado de bioinsumos cresce e tem futuro promissor no Brasil. 30 jun. 2023. Disponível em: < https://summitagro.estadao.com.br/sustentabilidade/mercado-de-bioinsumos-cresce-e-tem-futuro-promissor-no-brasil/>. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2023.

VIK, J. et al. Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, p. 120854, 2021/08/01/ 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120854

Published

2024-09-12

How to Cite

Peres Lorenzoni, L., Bandeira Marchesan, T. ., Mairesse Siluk, J. C. ., Rediske, G. ., & Rohenkohl Ricci, M. (2024). SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: THE DEVELOPMENT CYCLE OF BIOINPUTS. Revista Gestão E Desenvolvimento, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.25112/rgd.v21i2.3887